Skip to content
Dog Supplement Report
  • Home
  • ArticlesExpand
    • Brand Profiles
    • Consumer Alerts
    • Industry Analysis
    • Label Audits
    • Regulatory Watch
    • Investigations
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Disclosure
  • Editorial Policy
Dog Supplement Report
  • Uncategorized

    Investigation: ‘Veterinarian Recommended’ Claims on Dog Supplement Labels — How They’re Built

    By September 14, 2026

    Key Takeaways “Veterinarian recommended” is almost never a clinical claim — it is a marketing phrase constructed from small, compensated panels with no published methodology. No major canine supplement brand discloses the panel size, selection criteria, compensation structure, or sampling frame behind a “vet recommended” label. The phrase is not regulated by the FDA or…

    Read More Investigation: ‘Veterinarian Recommended’ Claims on Dog Supplement Labels — How They’re BuiltContinue

  • Uncategorized

    Investigation: What ‘Made in USA’ Actually Requires on a Dog Supplement Label

    By September 14, 2026

    Key Takeaways “Made in USA” on a dog supplement label has no single legal definition for human or pet food — it sits under FTC’s unqualified and qualified origin claims guidance, while FDA regulates labeling separately. The FTC’s 2021 Final Rule withdrew its proposal for a 100% U.S.-origin standard. An unqualified “Made in USA” claim…

    Read More Investigation: What ‘Made in USA’ Actually Requires on a Dog Supplement LabelContinue

  • Uncategorized

    Investigation: Subscription Lock-In Tactics at 9 Direct-to-Consumer Dog Supplement Brands

    By September 10, 2026

    Key Takeaways Nine DTC canine supplement brands were tested across cancellation friction, autorenewal disclosure clarity, and hidden-fee transparency; friction scores ranged from 2/10 to 9/10. Six of nine brands require account login or direct contact to cancel — only three offer a self-service online cancel button. Autorenewal terms were buried in checkout footnotes on four…

    Read More Investigation: Subscription Lock-In Tactics at 9 Direct-to-Consumer Dog Supplement BrandsContinue

  • Uncategorized

    Investigative: The ‘Made in USA’ Label on Dog Supplements — What Customs and Manufacturing Data Show

    By September 8, 2026

    Key Takeaways “Made in USA” is a FTC-regulated term: for products to carry the unqualified claim, “all or virtually all” of the manufacturing and significant components must originate in the U.S. — yet dog supplement labels rarely disclose the country of origin of active ingredients. Customs data, supplier filings, and label audits show that the…

    Read More Investigative: The ‘Made in USA’ Label on Dog Supplements — What Customs and Manufacturing Data ShowContinue

  • Uncategorized

    Investigative: Who Funds ‘Independent’ Canine Health Blogs — A Network Analysis

    By September 7, 2026

    Key Takeaways Affiliate disclosure compliance across canine health blogs remains inconsistent, with FTC endorsement guides requiring clear and conspicuous disclosure that many sites bury in footer text or omit entirely. Network analysis of “independent” review sites reveals common patterns: shared Amazon Associates IDs, identical product photography, and overlapping monetized link clusters that suggest undisclosed commercial…

    Read More Investigative: Who Funds ‘Independent’ Canine Health Blogs — A Network AnalysisContinue

  • Uncategorized

    Investigative: How Subscription Dog Supplement Brands Structure Cancellation Friction — A 12-Brand Audit

    By September 3, 2026

    Key Takeaways Subscription dog supplement brands deploy an average of 4.3 cancellation steps, with the highest-friction brand requiring 9 separate clicks or pages to cancel. Hidden auto-renewal disclosures sit inside pre-checked boxes, footer links, or Terms of Service paragraphs in 7 of the 12 audited brands. Retention dark patterns (“save 40%” offers, countdown timers, “are…

    Read More Investigative: How Subscription Dog Supplement Brands Structure Cancellation Friction — A 12-Brand AuditContinue

  • Uncategorized

    The Recall Ledger: Five Years of Pet Supplement Recalls by Brand and Cause

    By September 2, 2026

    Key Takeaways Between 2021 and 2026, the FDA Enforcement Report database recorded 47 pet supplement and treat withdrawal events affecting canine products, with microbial contamination and labeling/potency deviations accounting for the majority of documented causes. Pathogen-driven events (Salmonella, Listeria, and Aspergillus) cluster disproportionately around single-product or small-batch operations rather than large-volume contract manufacturers. Labeling and…

    Read More The Recall Ledger: Five Years of Pet Supplement Recalls by Brand and CauseContinue

  • Uncategorized

    Soft Chew Economics: Why Format Choice Drives Ingredient Quality Budgets

    By September 1, 2026

    Key Takeaways Soft chew supplements carry roughly 40–60% excipient load by weight, which directly squeezes the budget available for active ingredients. Heat extrusion (tunnel ovens typically running 130–160°F) and moisture control (water activity targets of 0.6 or below) impose hard limits on how much live bacterial culture a chew can deliver. Format economics explain why…

    Read More Soft Chew Economics: Why Format Choice Drives Ingredient Quality BudgetsContinue

  • Uncategorized

    The ‘Veterinary Formulated’ Seal: Who Verifies It and What It Legally Means

    By September 1, 2026

    Key Takeaways “Veterinary formulated” is a marketing claim with no federal regulatory definition — the FDA, FTC, and AAFCO do not certify, define, or enforce this phrase. Substantiation for such claims falls under FTC jurisdiction: advertisers must have competent and reliable scientific evidence, but no pre-market approval is required. AAFCO regulates nutritional adequacy statements on…

    Read More The ‘Veterinary Formulated’ Seal: Who Verifies It and What It Legally MeansContinue

  • Uncategorized

    What ‘Clinically Proven’ Legally Requires in Pet Supplement Advertising

    By August 31, 2026

    Key Takeaways “Clinically proven” is a marketing phrase with no single legal definition, but the FTC’s substantiation doctrine requires claims to be backed by evidence that matches the claim’s scope. Substantiation tiers range from anecdotal testimonials (weakest) through in vitro data, animal-model studies, and randomized controlled trials (strongest). The National Advertising Division (NAD) handles most…

    Read More What ‘Clinically Proven’ Legally Requires in Pet Supplement AdvertisingContinue

Page navigation

1 2 3 … 7 Next PageNext
Dog Supplement Report
Investigative Reporting on Pet Supplement Claims

Quick Links

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Editorial Policy
  • Disclosure
  • Privacy Policy

Categories

  • Industry Analysis
  • Investigations
  • Consumer Alerts
  • Label Audits
  • Regulatory Watch
  • Brand Profiles
© 2026 Dog Supplement Report. All rights reserved.
This site is for informational purposes only. Always consult your veterinarian.
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Brand Profiles
    • Consumer Alerts
    • Industry Analysis
    • Label Audits
    • Regulatory Watch
    • Investigations
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Disclosure
  • Editorial Policy